
Audience research
Part of How do you run sales enablement audience research that buyers trust?
How to define a sales enablement target audience: roles, evidence and firmographics
A practical guide to defining a sales enablement target audience, covering buyer roles, evidence sources, firmographic filters and testing the segment.
Use these decisions in order: clarify the work, identify the people involved, check the evidence and apply only useful company filters. If a branch exposes a gap, fix that part before planning content. Once the definition holds together, test it in a live cycle and keep separate maps when the buying jobs differ.
If the description could fit almost any account, then name the job
Start by stating what sales enablement must help someone accomplish. A broad description that could apply to nearly every prospect does not yet guide content or account choices. Tie the task to the people who approve, block or use the content, and distinguish that audience from a wider marketing reach.
A buyer persona can make the roles easier to understand, but keep the definition connected to the work each person needs to do. Name the approver, anyone able to halt a purchase, and the people who use the resulting content rather than relying on a general job-title list.
Test the short definition against audience research and buyer evidence. Then connect the task, roles and company type in plain language, revising the scope if it still describes almost every possible buyer. Rule of thumb: Define the work and the people first; add filters only when they make the audience more useful.
If colleagues disagree about the buyer, then compare deal records
Map the buying group before settling on job titles. Distinguish the economic buyer who releases budget, the blocker who can veto progress and the day-to-day users who work with the outcome.
These roles give the team a practical starting point for deciding which part of the buying group anchors the segment.
Ask sales managers to compare the last ten closed-won and closed-lost deals. Look for a role present in each win and absent from most losses, then use it as the anchor and map the other participants around it. The team roles and data can help organise this review.
Three roles in the buying group
Economic buyer
- Power
- Releases budget
- Anchor test
- In every win
Blocker
- Power
- Can veto
- Anchor test
- Missing in losses
Day-to-day users
- Power
- Live with outcome
- Anchor test
- Present in both
If sales and marketing name different buyers, return to the deal records instead of settling the question through opinion. Use the recurring role to anchor the segment, while keeping blockers and users visible in the map. Rule of thumb: Let evidence from wins anchor the segment, then place the other participants around it.
If the audience claim rests on assumption, then separate the evidence
Check a proposed audience against CRM records, published information and buyer conversations. CRM can show deal stages, job titles and loss reasons; those observations are different from broad market context or what buyers say about their needs. Keep each source distinct while you assess it.
Published labour market information, including earnings and working hours, can inform content planning. ONS business activity data adds context by industry, size and region; the ONS business activity release is one source to consult. Use CRM or buyer conversations to check an individual account's headcount band and buying model.
Three evidence sources to keep apart
CRM
- What it gives
- Deal stages, titles
- When to use
- Loss reasons
Labour market data
- What it gives
- Pay bands, team size
- When to use
- Content planning
Buyer conversations
- What it gives
- Problems in own words
- When to use
- Before seller contact
Buyer conversations can surface problems before someone speaks to a seller. Compare that language with deal records and published information rather than treating one source as conclusive. Check each claim against the others before turning it into an audience rule. Rule of thumb: Treat a claim as established only after checking it across distinct evidence sources.
If company traits change the sale, then keep only useful filters
Apply company-level filters when job titles alone leave the segment too broad. Test sector, headcount band, buying model and regulatory pressure, retaining a filter only if it changes the content, sales approach or account decision. A filter that makes no practical difference adds complexity without improving the audience definition.
Sector can help explain why the same role behaves differently, while headcount can indicate whether one person holds several roles or several people share them. Buying model can distinguish self-serve from tender-driven sales. For health and social care, consult the Care Quality Commission's regulated-activities guidance or the relevant regulator in the appropriate nation; remits vary by service.
| Decision | Example definition |
|---|---|
| Segment | UK B2B software companies selling to health and social-care providers |
| Firmographic filters | B2B software; the existing mid-market CRM band; a dedicated sales team; formal procurement or tenders; relevant health and social-care regulatory checks |
| Buying group | CRO or VP of Sales as economic buyer; procurement manager or information security manager as blocker; sales enablement manager and account executives as users |
| Jobs and content | Improve pipeline coverage with a discovery guide for account executives; provide approved, sector-relevant responses with a proof sheet |
| Evidence and tools | Check roles and outcomes in CRM, company information and SIC codes in Companies House, and market context in ONS data; connect each asset to its role and job in a sales-enablement platform |
Use the example as a filter test, not as a reason to keep every listed characteristic. If a company trait does not change what sellers need to do or what the content must address, remove it from the definition. Rule of thumb: Keep a firmographic filter only when it changes a selling decision.
If one asset is meant to serve every role, then split the jobs
Write down the outcome each role seeks, using the language that role uses. One piece of content may fail if it is expected to answer unrelated questions for a sales director, finance lead and day-to-day user.
Give each distinct job a suitable asset rather than stretching one item across the whole group.
A sales director may need pipeline coverage, while a finance lead may want predictable cost. A sales playbook template can support sellers with guidance for their work; it does not remove the need to map the other roles and their separate content needs.
When the jobs differ, make the distinction visible in the audience definition and content map. This keeps the material relevant to each role instead of making it generic for the sake of one shared asset. Rule of thumb: Match each audience job to an asset, and separate the definition when the jobs differ.
If the definition seems ready, then test it in a live cycle
Use one campaign or deal cycle to test a definition whose roles, evidence and filters agree. Keep the roles targeted and the period recorded so the outcome can be compared with the previous quarter. Activity provides a check on the map that a sense of completeness cannot provide by itself.
Track reply rate from the named roles, content use by reps and win rate against the previous quarter. Replies from unnamed roles may point to a missing part of the map; reps building their own decks may indicate that the content does not fit the job.
Use the comparison to guide the next revision, changing one variable at a time rather than changing the whole definition at once. Rule of thumb: Compare the same measures across periods, then adjust one part of the audience map.
If the test points to separate audiences, then keep their maps distinct
Create separate definitions when one team serves audiences with different roles or content needs. Combining them can produce generic material that neither group recognises. If results point to an unlisted role, decide whether it belongs in the existing buying group or whether it needs its own segment.
Three to five roles is a workable segment size: fewer may miss a blocker, while more can slow content planning. Keep each map small enough to name on one page, and review it quarterly or sooner if the product line, pricing model or main buying role changes.
Compare the maps with competitor research to check whether the audience and content remain specific to the work you support. Rule of thumb: Separate audiences when their buying roles or content jobs differ, and keep each map concise.



